Frequently Asked Questions
What are the trade-offs between appearance, environmental impact, and costs?
Public open spaces serve many functions, including beautification, recreation, and community pride. Yet maintaining a high level of appearance in every area without chemical tools may not be financially or operationally feasible.
Why do some parks and green spaces look less maintained?
As part of the City’s IPM strategy, City crews are reducing chemical use in public spaces. This shift supports environmental health and promotes biodiversity, which may result in more natural-looking landscapes — including taller grasses, flowering plants, and changes in overall park appearance. While these changes are intentional and beneficial to pollinators and local ecosystems, we understand they may be perceived by some as reduced maintenance. We appreciate the community’s support as we work toward more sustainable land management practices.
Does the City prefer non-chemical methods?
Yes. The City prioritizes non-chemical methods to protect health and the environment. However, in cases involving invasive weeds or health risks from pests such as yellow jackets, mice, or rats, chemical treatments may be necessary. All options are carefully evaluated to limit chemical use while keeping public spaces safe.
How does the City prioritize pollinator habitat development?
Pollinators are vital to healthy ecosystems and are a key focus of the City’s Bee City USA designation. Supporting them often involves redesigning landscapes, adjusting maintenance practices, and selecting more pollinator-friendly plants. The City is seeking City Council direction on how to develop pollinator-friendly areas that may require redesigning landscapes, adjusting maintenance schedules, and shifting plant pallets.